05:58:09 happs!! 05:58:15 dudes hows it going 05:58:25 happs working nicely? or happstack etc? 05:59:46 happening happs 06:10:08 can you get many dynamic pages a second as php? 06:29:23 depends on what you are doing and how you are doing it I would imagine 06:29:51 yeah 06:29:54 I guess so 06:30:02 so you are a big haskeler? 06:30:16 what makes you like haskell over c or ruby n al that? 06:31:28 the type system is really excellent 06:32:14 and you get the speed benefits of a compiled language with really powerful higher-level abstractions 06:32:29 and lots of great libraries to build upon on hackage 06:33:27 sounds nice 06:33:49 would you even build a commercial website using haskell? 06:35:51 you could, sure 06:36:04 I think a few people are already doing this 06:37:07 how about lisp 06:37:11 and forth and c 06:37:25 did you ever compare haskell to them? 06:37:40 I haven't done any forth, and only a little lisp 06:37:55 but I'm not a fan of C for complicated stuff 06:38:16 so the abstractions let you build complex things? 06:38:52 very complex things in a very structured, pure way 13:43:18 how can defined where the state is saved? 13:43:50 I tried startSystemStateAmazon but I get "Happstack-state has been built without replication support."? 13:46:22 McManiaC: you can do, runTxSystem (Queue (FileSaver "/srv/state-directory")) (Proxy :: Proxy MyState) 13:46:32 instead of calling startSystemState (Proxy :: Proxy MyState) 13:51:44 what kind is MyState? 13:51:49 *type 13:53:30 oh 13:53:31 nevermind 13:53:45 the same as for startSystemState 13:53:46 :) 13:53:54 :) 16:46:16 stepcut: i believe this might affect happstack, http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3910 16:47:19 dons: I would guess it would.. though I personally do not make my happstack apps setuid 16:48:16 Same here. I just run them as root. 16:49:17 Although the comparison to Python seems troublesome since Haskell is a compiled language 16:49:55 But I guess RTS ~= interpreter even though it doesn't necessarily feel that way. 17:10:39 right. 18:22:24 so gitit might be at risk 18:23:26 seems weird to me to make a server setuid :-/ 18:51:10 i think gitit runs as the user mostly. so likely not too many affected 19:05:09 running gitit as root is madness 19:05:16 it's had too many security holes 19:07:25 I wouldn't run it as root even on a non-networked machine; I'd be worried about fileuploads among other things going screwy at some point, or the PDF / tmpdir code in general 19:12:18 are there people that run gitit via cgi?